Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
45.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight334g / 11.78oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €59.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/440

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and weight (520g / 18,34oz). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.27 out of 10 (520g / 18,34oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX
