Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
45.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight334g / 11.78oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €59.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/440

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and weight (545g / 19,22oz). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX
