Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
45.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight334g / 11.78oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €59.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/440

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C5000X clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C5000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
