Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
45.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight334g / 11.78oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €59.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/440

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
93.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €593.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 160/0.16
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK 2500X clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Shimano Stella FK?
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Shimano Stella FK 2500X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX
