Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
60.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.88 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight246g / 8.68oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/350

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX clearly outshines Delphin IXTREK 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin IXTREK 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXTREK and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Delphin IXTREK 2000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X
