Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
60.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.88 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight246g / 8.68oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/350

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200
Conclusion
Both Delphin IXTREK 2000X and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin IXTREK 2000X offers a ball bearings of 6+1, while Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin IXTREK and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?
Delphin IXTREK 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX


Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX
