Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
60.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.9 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight254g / 8.96oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €43.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/360

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Delphin IXTREK 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin IXTREK 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXTREK and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin IXTREK 3000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X
