Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
60.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.9 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight254g / 8.96oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €43.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/360

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX clearly outshines Delphin IXTREK 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin IXTREK 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXTREK and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Delphin IXTREK 3000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X
