Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
60.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.9 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight254g / 8.96oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €43.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/360

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX edges out Delphin IXTREK 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Delphin IXTREK 3000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6+1 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Delphin IXTREK and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Delphin IXTREK 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX
