Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
60.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.9 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight254g / 8.96oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €43.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/360

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX edges out Delphin IXTREK 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). Still, Delphin IXTREK 3000X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.1:1 and a ball bearings of 6+1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Delphin IXTREK and Shimano Ultegra?
Delphin IXTREK 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
