Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
45.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight310g / 10.93oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/440

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X clearly outshines Delphin IXTREK 5000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Delphin IXTREK 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXTREK and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin IXTREK 5000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
