Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
45.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight310g / 10.93oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/440

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X clearly outshines Delphin IXTREK 5000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Delphin IXTREK 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXTREK and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin IXTREK 5000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
