Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
45.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight310g / 10.93oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/440

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Delphin IXTREK 5000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin IXTREK 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXTREK and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin IXTREK 5000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX
