Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
45.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight310g / 10.93oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/440

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin IXTREK 5000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Delphin IXTREK 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXTREK and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin IXTREK 5000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
