Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
45.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight310g / 10.93oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/440

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin IXTREK 5000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Delphin IXTREK 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXTREK and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin IXTREK 5000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X
