Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
45.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight310g / 10.93oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/440

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €383.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X clearly outshines Delphin IXTREK 5000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). While Delphin IXTREK 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXTREK and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Delphin IXTREK 5000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX
