Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
58.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/210

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin MonoDRAG and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Delphin REDIX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
