Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
58.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/210

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank85 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX clearly outshines Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (85 centimeter). While Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin MonoDRAG and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8 out of 10 (85 centimeter) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX
