Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
58.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/210

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin MonoDRAG and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
