Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
58.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/210

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X and Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X offers a gear ratio of 5.1:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin MonoDRAG and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
