Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
58.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/210

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200
Conclusion
Both Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X offers a ball bearings of 5+1, while Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin MonoDRAG and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?
Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX


Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX
