Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
58.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/210

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX edges out Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 5+1 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Delphin MonoDRAG and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX
