Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
57.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/215

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank85 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX clearly outshines Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (85 centimeter). While Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin MonoDRAG and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8 out of 10 (85 centimeter) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X
