Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
57.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/215

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin MonoDRAG and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X
