Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
57.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/215

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX clearly outshines Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin MonoDRAG and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX
