Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
