Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Delphin INKS 5000X
