Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X
