Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
57.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/200
Conclusion
Daiwa RX LT 2500X clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa RX LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG and Daiwa RX LT?
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa RX LT 2500X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X
