Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and total score (5.55 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
