Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and total score (5.55 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Battle III 3000X
