Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and total score (5.55 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X
