Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX
