Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X and Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Solid value at €29.95, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
