Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG, 2000, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 101001211
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDELPHIN
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €29.95
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200
Shimano Sahara 3000S R, Spinning reel with rear drag
Shimano Sahara 3000S R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics4.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight280g / 9.87oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €49.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000 S
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeRead drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Conclusion

Both Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X and Shimano Sahara 3000S R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, and durabilitymaximum drag. If you must choose between them, Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X offers a slight edge in ergonomics, while Shimano Sahara 3000S R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.

What's the difference between Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG and Shimano Sahara 3000S R?

Shimano Sahara 3000S R

  • When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles