Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X
