Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X
