Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
