Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and total score (5.55 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Tiagra 16X
