Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and total score (5.55 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
