Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and total score (5.55 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
