Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX
