Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Both Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X and Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX
