Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin RAYA body
Feeder And Match
44.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.63 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight584g / 20.6oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size55 Y
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/400

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin RAYA body, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin RAYA body may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin RAYA body and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
