Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin RAYA body
Feeder And Match
44.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.63 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight584g / 20.6oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size55 Y
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/400

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX and Delphin RAYA body score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Delphin RAYA body may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Delphin RAYA body and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Delphin RAYA body
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X
