Delphin REDIX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin REDIX
Feeder And Match
41.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.83 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight440g / 15oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €39.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/605

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX clearly outshines Delphin REDIX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (143g / 5,04oz). While Delphin REDIX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin REDIX and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Delphin REDIX
- With a ball bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.05 out of 10 (143g / 5,04oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
