Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin REDIX
Feeder And Match
41.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.83 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight440g / 15oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €39.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/605

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin REDIX score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a slight edge in line retrieve per crank, while Delphin REDIX may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Delphin REDIX and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Delphin REDIX
- With a ball bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8.11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74cm / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
