Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin REDIX
Feeder And Match
41.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.83 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight440g / 15oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €39.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/605

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 DH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX clearly outshines Delphin REDIX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch). While Delphin REDIX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin REDIX and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X
