Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin REDIX
Feeder And Match
41.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.83 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight440g / 15oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €39.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/605

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX clearly outshines Delphin REDIX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch). While Delphin REDIX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin REDIX and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
