Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin REDIX
Feeder And Match
41.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.83 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight440g / 15oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €39.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/605

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X clearly outshines Delphin REDIX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). While Delphin REDIX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin REDIX and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Delphin REDIX
- With a ball bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X
