Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390

Mitchell MX2 Spinning
Spinning
3000x
63.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.14 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag7.4kg / 16,31lbs
Weight258g / 9.1oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.31/125
Conclusion
Both Delphin SHARX 3000X and Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin SHARX 3000X offers a durability of 7 out of 10, while Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 89 centimeter / 35.04 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Mitchell MX2 Spinning?
Delphin SHARX 3000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (7,4kg / 16,31lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
