Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Both Delphin SHARX 3000X and Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin SHARX 3000X offers a gear ratio of 5.2:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin SHARX 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX
