Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Delphin SHARX
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390
Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Delphin SHARX 3000X and Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin SHARX 3000X offers a gear ratio of 5.2:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin SHARX 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons
Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX
Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX
Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X
Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X