Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Delphin SHARX 3000X and Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin SHARX 3000X offers a gear ratio of 5.2:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin SHARX 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX
